


Welcome to The Nature Conservancy of Idaho's blog, your source for Idaho natural history, wildlife, conservation and outdoor recreation. The views represented here are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official views of The Nature Conservancy.
If you’re already suffering from an illness, or have a comprised immune system, that simple burn could be enough to threaten your life.
Habitat is the same way. Healthy habitat is able to withstand the normal fluctuations and dramatic events that occur: flood, fire, predators, disease, invasive species.
If the habitat is not healthy, such factors could threaten the entire ecosystem.
Fire is a part of sagebrush habitat. But today, a burn in sagebrush habitat is often like a burn to a person with a comprised immune system.
The fire typically starts a cycle of non-native grasses like cheatgrass, which are prone to fire and cause hotter blazes. These repeated burns harm and eventually eliminate sagebrush habitat.
Sage grouse without sagebrush are like fish without water. The grouse need sagebrush and native plants for every stage of their life cycle.
That’s why The Nature Conservancy is working to keep habitat healthy, so that sagebrush country remains home to grouse and other wildlife—and can better withstand periodic fires.
Your support enables the Conservancy to work in places that still have excellent, healthy sagebrush-steppe habitat—the Pioneer Mountains, the Owyhee Canyonlands and the Crooked Creek area.
We’ve also developed innovative tools to help range managers select the places and methods where conservation can accomplish the most for sagebrush habitat. And we’re restoring areas with degraded habitat.
Your support is critical to these efforts. They’re truly keeping sage grouse (and other wildlife) in the sagebrush.
Image of fire near Silver Creek Preserve, Dayna Gross/TNC. Image of sage grouse, Bob Griffith.
Where to catch this great wildlife show?
Here are two upcoming opportunities to enjoy sage grouse on their leks. If you haven’t seen the sage grouse yet, make this your year.
Golden Eagle Audubon Lek Trip – April 2, 2011—The Golden Eagle Audubon Society offers a lek tour every year, leaving from Boise. It visits a sage grouse lek near Weiser. Typically, participants will have excellent views of 15-20 displaying grouse. The expert birders from Golden Eagle continue the trip through grasslands and wetlands, and you can often see many interesting birds, including burrowing owls, long-billed curlews, golden eagles and more. Phone Pam Conley at 208-869-0337 to sign up for this free excursion.
Dubois Grouse Days – April 15 and 16, 2011 - Dubois Grouse Days celebrates the great grouse leks (some of the largest remaining in the West) of eastern Idaho with two days of presentations, great food and visits to leks. One of the tours visits the Conservancy’s Crooked Creek Preserve, where participants should see fifty or more grouse displaying. This year’s speakers include wildlife photographer Paul Bannick, Idaho birder and photographer Kathleen Cameron (who also frequently photographs Silver Creek) and falconer Jack Oar. This is a great event to see sage grouse and support a small, rural Idaho community through wildlife tourism.
Image by Bob Griffith
The map above, designed by Nathan Welch of the Idaho Chapter, shows the size of Idaho compared to our Patagonian Grasslands project as well as the relative position of the 45th parallel in each location. In the Idaho, it’s safe to say we have our hands full with our work. Our 27 employees work hard to implement conservation strategies for sagebrush steppe, forests, and freshwater habitats across Idaho.
The Patagonian Grasslands team has just five permanent staff members. So that’s 1/5 the staff covering 4 times the area. It’s simply not feasible to manage preserves, monitor conservation easements, and do hands-on stewardship projects like we do in Idaho. They’ve got to rely on partners to do much of the on-the-ground work.
The Conservancy’s three strategies for the Patagonia Grasslands are:
1. Sustainable grazing
2. Public protected areas
3. Private lands conservation
Done right, these strategies hold the promise of conserving habitat across millions of grassland acres.
The key to success in implementing these strategies is engaging partners like sheep producers, Argentina’s National Park Service, and Fundacion Neuquen – the country’s first land trust. Established in 2008, the Patagonian Grasslands project is young and ambitious. After spending a month here, I’m convinced they’re on the right track, and I’m optimistic, given time, they’ll be able to answer my opening question.
-- Bas Hargrove, from TNC's Patagonian Grasslands office in Bariloche, Argentina.
Photos, top to bottom. 1. Francisco P. Moreno; 2. Perito and me; 3. Grace enjoying Nahuel Huapi National Park.
-- Bas Hargrove, Week 3 of Coda Fellowship in Argentina.
Halverson documents the global spread of a beautiful wild fish once confined to waters of the American West. It's an amazing and sometimes exasperating story: People believed the best way to improve "rivers" was by stocking them with "better" species like rainbow trout, giving rise to a massive hatchery system that continues to produce trout by the millions to this day.
For years, the stocking of non-native fish was viewed as sound conservation practice--a way to sustain fishing while rivers underwent dramatic changes. Even John Muir supported trout stocking in Sierra Nevada lakes.
Adding to fishery dilemmas was our nation's surprisingly complicated attitudes towards fishing. Early Puritans considered it an idle activity that led to sin and damnation, but later politicians viewed it as a "manly" activity that could keep urban citizens from growing too soft.
Factors like these led to enthusiastic, and "science based" fish stocking, often at the expense of native species. Halverson's most dramatic example was the mass poisoning of all native fish in the upper Green River to make way for an introduction of trout. At the time, this was considered scientifically defensible.
And that, perhaps, suggests the real issue here: that conservation is so often about values more than science, a point Halverson's book makes repeatedly. Even today, the push to remove non-natives and restore native trout rests on a value for native ecosystems more than scientific necessity.
Writes Halverson: "I do believe, though, that those who promote the conservation and restoration of native species should do so with a good understanding of history and a concomitant sense of humility. People have been a part of this world for a long time. There's no going back to the way it was, even if it were possible to define it. Reading through the letters and public pronouncements of the men who were most responsible for spreading nonnative species like rainbow trout throughout the world in the nineteenth century, I have been struck by the similarity of the rhetoric of those who promote native species restoration today. They, too, were sure they were doing the right thing for the world."
Yes. That's it exactly. One hopes that, indeed, humility and conservation history could help inform our many pressing conservation issues today. Halverson's book shows that many societal factors have always informed our values about the natural world--a fact that continues to influence conservation to this day. --Matt Miller