The Draft Alternative builds upon and adds details to the Task Force recommendations discussed in this blog, which was published on June 28. To view the Draft Alternative and the Task Force recommendations, go to: http://fishandgame.idaho.gov/public/wildlife/?getPage=310
The Nature Conservancy is preparing specific recommendations drawn from the task force’s work to ensure the State’s plan effectively conserves sage grouse and their habitats.
Greater sage grouse strutting on a lek. Photo by Sara Sheehy.
Headlines about Idaho’s new conservation strategy for
greater sage grouse have attracted a lot of attention in recent weeks. With declining populations in 11 western
states, the sage grouse could become protected under the Endangered Species
Act. This potential listing has put the bird under intense public attention. ESA
regulations could profoundly affect economic and land use activities in the
bird’s sagebrush steppe habitat, which includes 15 million acres in Idaho – more
than a quarter of the land in the state.
Last March Governor Butch Otter created a sage grouse task
force and gave it a daunting assignment – craft a conservation plan grouse
strong enough to avoid an ESA listing, involve impacted industries and
interests, and ensure sage grouse habitat on public lands remains available for
multiple uses.
Will Whelan, Director of Government Relations for The Nature
Conservancy’s Idaho Chapter, served as one of two task force members
representing conservation interests – along with John Robison of the Idaho
Conservation League. Other members
represented defined interests, including livestock grazing, electrical
utilities, mining, hunting, county government, and the Legislature. Two members represented the public at
large.
“It was one of the most interesting and challenging
assignments in my 27-year career in environmental policy and conservation,”
said Whelan. “I have to admit that I had doubts about whether the task force would
succeed. Our sixteen members had strikingly different opinions and very little
time to master a complex subject.”
But, three months of intense meetings and discussions paid
off. The task force members took their
task seriously. They knew that a weak
plan would simply fail to pass muster with the federal agencies that manage
public lands and implement the ESA. “The
task force members really strived to balance their economic interests with the
real need to protect sage grouse. By the
end, the task force became more than the sum of its parts,” said Whelan.
While not perfect or complete in every detail, the task
force recommendations set a sound course for sage grouse conservation in Idaho. The task force report lays out dozens of
measures, including limiting new transmission lines, energy facilities, and other
development in high quality sage grouse habitat, strengthening efforts to fight
fire and invasive weeds, and ensuring public lands livestock grazing is managed
to meet sage grouse habitat objectives.
The task force focused much of its effort on identifying the
high quality sage grouse habitat in Idaho and drafting policies that give
priority attention to the most important areas.
The task force recommended that sage grouse habitat be divided into core,
important, and general sage grouse zones.
Lands that are especially productive sage grouse were proposed
for designation as “core habitat.” This
zone covers one-third of acres occupied by sage grouse in Idaho but includes
two thirds of the sage grouse leks (male dancing grounds). The task force quickly grasped that
protecting these strongholds is the key to the long-term survival of sage
grouse. The task force suggested strong
restrictions on development of new infrastructure such as roads, transmission
lines, and energy facilities on public lands within core habitat. This area would also be a priority for
firefighting, weed control, grazing management, and habitat restoration
activities.
The “important habitat” zone covers a bit less than
one-third of sage grouse habitat in Idaho and has about one-quarter of the leks
in the state. The task force understood
that protecting the important habitat will help maintain the sage grouse
populations that breed there, connect the core habitat zones, and protect areas
used by migrating sage grouse. The policies
governing development in important habitat, while more flexible than in core
habitat, would limit sage grouse impacts from new construction and require
developers to replace the value of lost habitat by completing restoration
projects.
The “general habitat” zone covers over five million acres
but is estimated to support just 10 percent of the leks and five percent of the
birds in Idaho. Accordingly, this zone
has the most flexible policies. New
infrastructure development will have to include practices that minimize harm to
sage grouse and may be required to mitigate for impacts.
The task force recommendations are available on the
Department of Fish and Game’s website: http://fishandgame.idaho.gov/public/wildlife/?getPage=310
The Office of Governor Otter is currently reviewing the task
force’s recommendations and will soon ask for the public comment to comment on
the sage grouse strategy.
“The Nature Conservancy plans to stay involved,” Whelan
explains. “The task force did a good job
of charting a course for conservation, but many key details still need to be
filled-in. Moreover, the tight deadlines
that we operated under meant we had to focus primarily on actions on federal
public lands. We think the State of
Idaho also should develop a list of actions by willing private parties, local
governments, and the State of Idaho that complement the Task Force’s
recommendations. We will continue to advocate for clear and meaningful actions
that will protect the bird and its native sagebrush habitats. ”
1 comment:
The task force signed on to absolute nonsense. To believe that livestock have no effect on sage grouse or their habitat is malpractice. The following is completely untrue and anyone who signed on to these recommendations should be ashamed.
No studies exist that directly relate livestock grazing systems or stocking rates to sage-grouse abundance or productivity. Most concerns about grazing effects on sage-grouse are focused on local conditions (e.g., riparian issues, heavy use at water troughs) but what sage-grouse respond to and are affected by are conditions at the larger landscape. Therefore, grazing should be viewed as a landscape stressor with monitoring and management actions conducted at appropriate scales. Accordingly, the FWS does not consider livestock grazing in general as a threat to the species. Only where management issues are documented over time does this activity rise to the level of a secondary threat.
Unfortunately, assessing effects of livestock grazing at relatively large spatial scales is very difficult due to a lack of adequate control sites and a lack of understanding of sagebrush systems prior to introduction of livestock (Knick et al 2011). Most research has been conducted in the presence of grazing. This lack of knowledge of grazing in a landscape context complicates efforts to develop meaningful recommendations for grazing practices in sage-grouse habitat. However, numerous studies have been published providing detailed information on characteristics of sage-grouse seasonal habitats (Knick and Connelly 2011). These studies provide insight on heights and cover of sagebrush and herbaceous plants needed for productive habitats (Connelly et al. 2000).
Post a Comment